Please Read, Dear People...

Please Read, Dear People...

 Paul is not divinely inspired therefore making The New Testament completely baseless. (Click Here)
Dear Reader, assuming you are an adherent of the faith of Christianity. When one researches a case, they must empirically analyse with the current data available without tailoring nor distorting the facts with the existing notions within their brains in order to come to a rational conclusion. The Gospels explain that Jesus was very popular as according to (Matt. 4:24, 9:26). Yet, he was rejected by the people in (John 1:11). Sadly, Jesus was not very popular; many Greek and Roman historians did not record his miracles. After his departure, his teachings spread to North Africa and Egypt, but he was still not popular or widely known. As a matter of fact, not in one source do we see Ptolemy, Seneca, Apollonius  and Philo-Judaeus, although these men were in nearby countries to Jesus, we fail to see any document in regards to Jesus even walking among them. The Greek and Roman historians do not mention the Gospel events which indicate to us that these are fables. Even the Jewish philosopher Philo (50 CE) fails to mention anything in regards to the "comeback" of the alleged "Son of God".    It is extremely easy to get lost in the Trinity dilemma as presented by the myriad of missionaries and priests alike with the great aptitudes of lying unknowingly commit the logical fallacy of circulus in probando (i.e circular reasoning) which goes round and round without ever resolving the issue at hand. Once a particular subject is breached, it cannot be as trusted as once previously thought. How can one truly believe the claim that Jesus is God when there is an abundant of different books ranging up to seventy? While the previous (and more reliable) scriptures contradict the newer teachings? 

To have another language is to possess a second soul. – Charlemagne 

  Christians, although constantly boasting to be Bible readers and the ‘true’ followers of God. Do not even speak of Hebrew & Koine Greek. An immensely hypocritical act on their behalf as one should surely be able to practice what they preach. Not possessing the knowledge nor the linguistic aspects of their "Sacred" scriptures should grant their statements no authority. Merely relying on a translation is nothing but disastrous as the readers are being manipulated like puppets. (Click here for an example)  According to The Catholic Encyclopedia:“The idea of a complete and clear-cut canon of the New Testament existing from the beginning, that is from Apostolic times, has no foundation in history. The Canon of the New Testament, like that of the Old, is the result of a development, of a process at once stimulated by disputes with doubters, both within and without the Church, and retarded by certain obscurities and natural hesitations, and which did not reach its final term until the dogmatic definition of the Tridentine Council.” 

Is the creator of the heavens and the earth not intelligent enough to keep a book intact? If he were going to "inspire" several authors, why has he not prevented them from error? How could it be possible that in order for us to reach out to him, he communicates in a manner through fallacious human beings who will most definitely "and have" made mistakes in the scriptures? As a matter of fact, those scriptures have been changed. (Click here) and also (Click Here). 

The Interpreter's Dictionary Of The Bible has stated: “It is safe to say that there is not one sentence in the NT in which the MS tradition is wholly uniform.” (2)

As claimed by the religion's very own Biblical theologians. The Bible not only lacks a genuine preservation, it has also been altered with inserted texts after a period of time. An individual must take claims made by the current followers of Christ with nothing but a minuscule grain of salt. 

Thirty Christian Scholars took up the challenge at the initial meeting in Berkeley, California. Where a Jesus seminar was held by the Westar institute in order to determine the authenticity of Jesus’ sayings in the Gospels. “Among the findings is that, in the judgment of the Jesus Seminar Fellows, about 18 percent of the sayings and 16 percent of the deeds attributed to Jesus in the gospels are authentic.”  (3)  Sadly enough, The majority of Christianity relies on these fallacious, historically bankrupt testimonies of Jesus in The Gospels.  The same God that "inspired" The Old Testament "inspired" The New Testament, without The Old Testament there is no basis or premise for Christianity. When put in this predicament, Christians will resort to a liberal "pick-and-choose" religion that makes them feel good but does not answer any of life's harder questions or just accept the Divinely revealed morality of The Bible "as is" also topping it off with "God words in mysterious ways."  66 Books, 1,189 Chapters, and nearly 740,000 words are claimed to be a road-map through the divinity of Jesus, our God, yet they even fail to date Jesus' birth accurately!  If people decide what is "Jesus' Word" & what is not His word based on their preconceived notions and "modern" sensibilities, nothing would be left of The Bible...

When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said 'Let us pray.' We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.
 – Desmond Tutu


 Ever since the sailing of Christopher Columbus across the globe which has paved the way for their lying missionaries to spread their faith. They are well known throughout history to hide behind the guise of religion in order to obtain economic, political and social power. In addition, they’ve also reflected on new policies of creating not just "colonies of exploitation", but also "colonies of settlement" from which to launch missions dedicated to converting the natives to Christianity. (1) Christians have therefore used these methods as a means  to exploit their propaganda across various platforms and continents. Dwelling in their usual fallacious accusations and half-distorted truths, will so often resort to lies such as: “The scientific errors in the Bible are on the errors of mankind, for medieval humans were oblivious to such notions and lacked the modern-day instruments.” 

The above statement does need to be further indulged. As it is a petty excuse. However, one can present the following verses from The Bible in order to refute the excuse: "As for God, his way is perfect; the word of the LORD is flawless...." (2 Samuel 22:31)
"Every word of god is flawless......" (Proverbs 30:5)

Even the King James Version of The Bible has confessed of all the grave errors (Click Here). When presented with these accusations, you will be exposed to the reflection of modern-Christian attitude by the way they interpret their sacred scriptures. This attitude, being an outcome of growing skepticism since the nineteenth century of the existence of scientific inaccuracies in the Biblical texts. Hence bringing forth the birth of the antagonism between Religion vs. Science debates. They have deluded themselves greatly into adopting a poor mindset that the notion of a text of revelation by God has then become a text “inspired” by God but written down by human hands. To help elucidate this matter. The several volumes and editions of books can only imply it is nothing but a speculation. The anonymous Biblical authors, it came to be assumed, might have introduced inaccuracies to the text arising from the language of the day or from ideas and traditions still honoured and prevalent at the time (human forgeries). These individuals strongly identify with their beliefs, opinions, ideas and tastes. They cannot stand anyone disagreeing with them because disagreeing with them means disagreeing with who they are as a person. They become very stubborn to the point that they do not even consider the opinion of others because they feel threatened by the very people who disagree with them.


BrightData Proxy Download:

Boost Your Social Media Following: 
https://socialboost.grsm.io/ScienceOfTheBible

Best CRM to Organize Your Gmail:
https://get.streak.com/ScienceOfTheBible





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ants Have No Commander?

Ants Have No Commander? Although ants are frustrating when they get into your home or  when you’re having a picnic, ants do help the environment. They are social insects, which means they live in large colonies or groups. Depending on the species, ant colonies can consist of millions of ants. There are three kinds of ants in a colony: The queen, the female workers, and males. The queen and the males have wings, while the workers don’t have wings.   I n The Bible, it asserts that ants have no commander, no overseer or ruler. Despite ants having ant farms where they form a myriad of colonies. “Go to the ant, you sluggard;   consider its ways and be wise!   It has no commander no overseer or ruler    yet it stores its provisions in summer   and gathers its food at harvest.” (Proverbs 6:6:8) According to the Oxford Dictionary, Command is:  Have authority over; be in charge of (a unit) Ants form   colonies   that range in size from a few dozen predatory individuals living
Read more

How Old Was Ahaziah?

How Old Was Ahaziah?  If you are still not convinced about the inconsistency regarding the bible’s corruption, maybe this could give you a little hint. In order to cover a contradiction in the bible, the translators will resort to lying. But truth will always stand out from faulty. So now to the question, Was Ahaziah 22 or 42 when he became king? “Ahaziah was twenty-two years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem one year. His mother's name was Athaliah, a granddaughter of Omri.” (2 Chronicles 22) “Ahaziah was twenty-two years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem one year. His mother's name was Athaliah, a granddaughter of Omri king of Israel.” (2 Kings 8:26) As a matter of fact, let’s take a further look at several of the translations of 2 Chronicles 22. (see here) At face value, it seems to be splendid.  On the contrary, you will be in for a rude awakening.  Both chapters and translations say twenty-two years old. Yet wh
Read more

Pagan-Santa Clause!

Pagan-Santa Clause! Was the Grinch who stole Christmas an agnostic?  You might want to cover little Timmy's ears for this one. For those who do not know, the earliest Christians including the Apostles and disciples of Christ never celebrated such an event. Historically absent from any of the four gospel accounts is the mention of a yearly celebration of Jesus’s birth. During Jesus’s ministry, no such celebration is ever recorded.  Christmas  or  Christmas Day  is an annual festival commemorating the birth of  Jesus. O bserved most commonly on the 25th of December  as a religious and cultural celebration among billions of people around the world. Funny enough, Santa has been google searched more than Jesus for the past eleven years.  Although some Christian groups reject the celebration. Christians themselves cannot admit that he was even born in December. As a matter of fact, The Bible actually contradicts the notion of winter.  The fallacious and logically incoher
Read more